Thursday, 1 March 2012

The Outcome


Islamic financial system aims for social justice and redistribution the money from wealthy to poor people. A set of financial roles (conditions) was designed and is believed if, implemented will help social justice.

First, Risk Sharing: which means that any party engaged in a business transaction should both share the profit and loss of the outcome and that no individual party bear the loss or even gain the whole profit (sharing principle and social justice).

Second, the availability of financial resources: it is emphasised by both no interest on loans and zakat money which eventually reduces poverty, creates employment opportunities, self-employment, increase both demand and production. This is mainly based on the idea of redistribution of wealth.

And it all came from the basic principle, that the money does not have a value but it is a medium of exchange which goes back retrospectively to Say’s theory.

However, the ultimate thing which this system aims to is dignity, which is an essential human need.

 The Islamic system claims in its teaching that the full or semi application of the Islamic finance system reduces poverty and inequality. But surprisingly rare or sometimes no evidence provided by Muslim countries which evaluate it effectiveness on poverty and social justice.

 Hence, it raises the point that what prevents Islamic countries from the full application of zakat? 
  • Is it the influence and power of rich people?
  •  Or the hole in the faith of Islam!


I hope that John Bird , Founder and Editor-in-Chief, The Big Issue is wrong on that: "Humans love to take rather than to give”. And that is the power is the reason. 



Zakat Vs. Tax


The main difference between tax and zakat is that the latter is mainly imposed on accumulated savings (wealth) and not on the daily or monthly income of the individual. 

As illustrated in the figure below, zakat is paid on the accumulation of wealth and the reason is that Islamic system does not want the individuals to be obliged for tax payments and not buying the essential living needs. But it wait tell the individual accumulates savings and then charge the individual 2.5% on savings which will be then a small amount of the total savings taken to zakat beneficiaries.




The other difference between zakat and tax, that the earlier has its own eight defined beneficiaries which is clear in the Quran as stated by Behdad and Nomani (2009).In contrast, tax money usage varies from country to another and changes over time. For zakat beneficiaries categories please refer to the following link

 Surprisingly, the government is not one of the beneficiaries. So how the government will generate income?

Al-Atawi (2010) claims that the state does not need tax money because it will use it self-generated income by employing it money in different projects e.g. infrastructure which others such as the private sector are not interested to do it. Hence, profit generating projects such as sea ports and airports will be the government main focus. And he adds that why to charge taxes in something the government did not contributed in its creation!

Zakat is also applied on corporate as well as individuals. In addition, it is imposed on other form of income with different charge rates. For further zakat categories (Payers) please refer to the following link